Thursday, February 24, 2005

Sperm Donor

Stephanie pointed me to this story:

CHICAGO (AP) - An appeals court said a man can press a claim for emotional distress after learning a former lover had used his sperm to have a baby. But he can't claim theft, the ruling said, because the sperm were hers to keep.

Phillips accuses Dr. Sharon Irons of a "calculated, profound personal betrayal" after their affair six years ago, saying she secretly kept semen after they had oral sex, then used it to get pregnant.

The judges backed the lower court decision to dismiss the fraud and theft claims, agreeing with Irons that she didn't steal the sperm.

"She asserts that when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift - an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee," the decision said. "There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request."

Good stuff. But the money quote, pardon the expression:

"There's a 5-year-old child here," Mirabelli said. "Imagine how a child feels when your father says he feels emotionally damaged by your birth."

HAH! Imagine how this child will feel when he finds out how he was conceived! Talk about emotional damage...


Blogger ryan bradley said...

I will not, repeat: will NOT! pardon the expression. You are a sick, SICK man.

I am surprised he can even press a claim for emotional distress.

8:02 AM  
Blogger Matthew said...

Well, if there is anything that is emotionally damaged enough to get damages, this would be it, methinks.

9:53 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home